This file can be printed for personal use and study. © Reachout Trust - www.reachouttrust.org

If it is Possible... (Romans 12:18)

It has been observed that against stupidity even the gods contend in vain. Overlooking momentarily the heretical notion that there may be more than one God, I think it would be fair to observe that every thinking Christian knows the validity of the saying.

"Is there anything God can't do?" someone asks with an air of smug satisfaction at having thrown out a fathomless challenge they are convinced we cannot possibly meet. "Yes," we might reply. "God can't make a sensible enquiry out of a stupid question, or a wise prescription from a foolish edict."

Political correctness is one of those things that seems to confound "the gods", frustrate the wise and yet delight the domineering autocrats who always feel they know best what is "fair" "right" correct" and "proper". These are the sensitive souls who, assuming we are all as thin-skinned as they are, insist that we mustn't say "slum" but use the phrase "inner city". We can't say "blacklisted" for fear of offending ethnic minorities, and we shouldn't call someone "dishonest" but rather say they are "ethically disoriented" and, of course, we must be "inclusive" in all things for fear anyone should feel discriminated against and left out.

It is this last point I want to address. Some will have noticed the press release issued this week from Birmingham University's Christian Union describing their being banned from using Student Union Guild rooms and having their bank accounts frozen. Their offence is to be found in their constitution, a scurrilous document by some accounts, that describes members of its fellowship as "men and women" (the temerarious audacity of it) when it should read "people". This oversight (or is it a conspiracy on the part of the Christians?), this use of "exclusive" language marginalises those who are transsexual/transgender "persons". They then have the unmitigated temerity to insist that, although anyone is welcome to CU meetings, nevertheless formal membership is open only to those who profess faith in Jesus Christ! You would almost think they had some God-given right.

I have this picture in my mind of an army of transsexual/transgender "persons" storming the Student Union offices brandishing banners carrying the legend, "Give us Christian Union membership or we die!" An even larger crowd of unbelievers waving placards bearing the slogan, "Non-Christians are Christians too!" joins them. Pretty soon there is an SU revolution as societies, special interest and self-help groups are told that university societies must include everyone, interests cannot any longer be special, and self-help is just an excuse for huddling in a corner and leaving others out.

The Mountaineering Society is deluged with applications from former members of the vertigo self-help group. A crowd of enthusiastic orienteers overwhelms the Agoraphobia self-help group. Pacifists prove enthusiastic, and at the same time stoically passive, members of the War Games Society and philophobes queue up to join the campus dating agency. There is a battle of wits in the Philosophical Society between those students who aspire to higher thought, thrilled by Wittgenstein, Goethe and Nietzsche, and those who can't be asked so long as a good time is had by all ("Whatdya mean, 'that isn't a philosphy?'). And the Literary Society adopts a new motto, "Being illiterate doesn't make you a bad person."

Yes, the PC brigade are on the march, making sure that every view is included - so long as it coincides with their own. How anyone might reasonably expect to be included in the decision making of a group or society in which they have no meaningful interest, indeed to which they may prove temperamentally and actively opposed, is beyond comprehension. Yet there are those amongst us who cannot sleep a wink until they have ensured that the rights of the vertiginous to stand atop mountains, the agoraphobic to take a long walk outside, and the shy and retiring to speak out in front of millions is enshrined in law. Who are these people? This mysterious "they" who spend their lives prescribing and, more often, proscribing in the lives of others?

There are those, especially among the young and idealistic, whose views are not tempered by experience and whose values are not yet fully developed fed by the soil of reason and accommodation. They do not yet own a broader view, a longer view of life, perhaps because not enough life has happened to them yet. These people see an injustice, as they define injustice, and are immediately in a hurry to put it right whether the parties concerned welcome their involvement or not. They do not appreciate diplomacy - it takes to long - and so resort to juridical solutions that, though they may seem harsh and peremptory, nevertheless get the job done. Soon the offending party (who never meant offence) is put right, and the rights of the offended (who saw no offence until it was high-lighted, and even then…) are restored and protected. Finally "they" can get their sleep while the rest of us toss and turn wondering whether we have slipped through a rent in time to a parallel universe.

For those who see their calling in life as putting the rest of us right I offer a piece of biblical advice. It is, I confess, rather homely and may appear to be rather quaint and old-fashioned, but I have found it a much more robust and difficult lesson than one might at first think. Having learned it (like everything else in my case, the hard way) it has stood me in good stead over the years. It is taken from the letter of Paul, a first century Christian leader, to Christian believers in Rome, a place that was multicultural, multiethnic and that saw innumerable religions, philosophies and practices every day. In other words not one society but many, perhaps like a modern university. Paul wrote:

"Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse. Rejoice with those who rejoice; mourn with those who mourn. Live in harmony with one another. Do not be proud, but be willing to associate with people of low position. Do not be conceited. Do not repay evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." (Romans 12:14-18)

Paul knew that it takes all sorts to make a world and that, regardless of our differences, we all have to rub along somehow. Lest anyone thinks I have just made "their" point for "them" let me point out that harmony cannot happen unless there is diversity. In music harmony may be described as "the pleasant sounding combination of simultaneous musical notes in a chord." It refers to composition and structure achieved through the harmonious combination of different notes to produce a pleasing sound. In other words, it takes all sorts of notes to make a harmony. To insist on one note, or one chord, as being definitive of music is to rob music of its magic. It makes as much sense as insisting the string section adopt the techniques of the timpani. In the same way, to insist on one rule "inclusiveness" as being definitive of a whole society is to be "conceited". Nobody wants it, except those who insist that the way they look at that society is the only way.

If I put the best spin on the news from Birmingham University SU I have a feeling that the picture Paul paints is probably a lot like what "they", or at least some of them, were trying to achieve. In which case it is a laudable goal. It may be encouraging as well as enlightening for "them" to realise that Christians are meant to embrace fully these words of Scripture and "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone." "They" should bear in mind, however, that they don't always make it easy with their misguided sense of right and wrong. And that if they really want the society Paul describes and perhaps want to benefit from having Christian friends and neighbours who reflect this philosophy they might consider adopting it themselves and making room for Christians as they are determined to make room for everyone else.


Back to Readings Menu